Nota su una crux a Claud. Don. Aen. 6,360 p. 555,6 (ed. Georgii 1905)

The inconsistency between T. Claudius Donatus’ commentary on Aen. 6,360 and the corresponding vergilian text is pointed out by Heinrich Georgii (Lipsiae 1905) with a crux, in the belief that Donatus, given the obvious divergence from the hypotext, could not read the eneadic lemma as it has been transmitted. This paper suggests a correction to Georgii’s editorial choice on the basis of some philological, linguistic and intertextual considerations.